×
Discover our latest MSP Partner Case Study with SiteTechnology
Read Now!Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), alongside its 2-layer cousin, 2-Factor Authentication (2FA), is one of the most used tools today in the cybersecurity arsenal of companies and software-as-a-service (SaaS) vendors alike. In this blog, we will dive right into the various benefits of using an MFA to authenticate users, the different types for it, and also the challenges in […]
Author
Date
Category
All Categories
Contents
Popular Posts
Product
Join the Newsletter
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), alongside its 2-layer cousin, 2-Factor Authentication (2FA), is one of the most used tools today in the cybersecurity arsenal of companies and software-as-a-service (SaaS) vendors alike. In this blog, we will dive right into the various benefits of using an MFA to authenticate users, the different types for it, and also the challenges in making MFA ubiquitous.
One of the key cybersecurity measures available today to protect online accounts, MFA is used to add extra layers of authentication before granting access to someone, instead of just authenticating him or her via user credentials, typically involving a username/email and password. With MFA, even if an attacker manages to guess or steal a user’s password, they would still need to provide additional authentication factors to gain access.
MFA relies on more than a single proof to authenticate the identity of a person and makes it more difficult for unauthorized individuals to access a user’s account or a company’s network and resources. Even if one of the factors to authenticate an identity is compromised, there are more layers that can still protect the user/organization from getting breached.
The authentication process in MFA involves verifying a user’s identity through multiple “proof points”, categorized into three main types, using various tools such as email, SMS, or various authenticator apps that are available in the app stores.
There are various methods of MFA, each with its unique features and security levels. Below, we go over the commonly used types of authenticating users via layers, including through adaptive authentication.
The most common form of MFA is the combination of a password and a security question. The user first enters their password, and then they are prompted to answer a security question which they had filled out the answer for before during the account sign-up.
Biometric authentication involves using the user’s unique physical characteristics for verification. This may include fingerprint scanning, facial recognition, voice recognition, or retina scanning. This form of MFA is considered highly secure because these attributes are unique to each individual. Nowadays, a lot of mobile devices enable facial recognition as an added step to authentication.
Hardware tokens or key fobs are physical devices that generate a one-time password (OTP) for user authentication. Once the user enters their username and password, they input the OTP generated by the token to gain access.
Software tokens function similarly to hardware tokens but are digital. OTPs are generated on a software application, which can be installed on a user’s mobile device or computer as part of the MFA process. For example, some banks utilize software tokens, generated through their mobile bank apps, before they allow access to the account on their website.
In this MFA method, after entering the username and password, the user receives an MFA OTP through an SMS or an email. Only after they enter the OTP, are they allowed access to the account.
Authenticator apps are security applications available in app stores that can be used for MFA purposes. Here’s how they generally work:
Authenticator apps do not rely on SMS or voice calls, which are vulnerable to interception and SIM swapping attacks. Instead, they use a time-based one-time password (TOTP) algorithm, making them a more secure method of MFA.
Some examples of authenticator apps today include Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator, Duo, and various others.
MFA is a great tool to protect online accounts against unauthorized access. Having said that, it does have some drawbacks. Let’s explore them:
Before granting access to a SaaS app, or a company network, the Timus ZTNA solution will thoroughly verify a user’s identity not only via user credentials, but also through a rich set of contextual behavioral checklists. The checklist includes such things as looking at a user’s device, current location, comparing the current location to the previous one to see if there’s an impossible travel that’s been made, the IP address, the country the user is trying to connect from, if their email is breached on the dark web, and so on. If, based on the checklist, Timus ZTNA decides that there’s a risk that this person is not who they say they are, only then an MFA is pushed to the user as an additional form of authentication. Using MFA in this manner adaptively helps tremendously with the user experience and mitigates the MFA fatigue.
Multi-Factor Authentication is a potent tool in the cybersecurity arsenal. It offers significantly higher security than the traditional method of checking only the user credentials, making it more challenging for attackers to gain unauthorized access. MFA not only helps with security, but is also an important part of being compliant for various regulations, and to be able to get cyber insurance as a company. While it may come with its challenges, the benefits of implementing an MFA far outweigh them. Modern network security solutions such as Timus utilize MFA in a dynamic and adaptive manner to minimize user MFA fatigue.
Zero Trust. Adaptive Cloud Firewall. Secure Remote Access. In one.